| |
EVALUATION
Evaluation services and resources are an integral foundation of GMU’s
CAPH. Professionals provide expertise on needs assessment and evaluation
strategies
with campus, community, state and national organizations. A range of
quantitative and qualitative approaches is used to gain insight and document
results. GMU’s CAPH professionals provide detailed assistance to
organizations and individuals seeking to document programmatic initiatives.
Specific skills include Evaluation Process Design, Instrument Development,
Implementation, Data Entry and Review, Report Preparation, and Debriefing
Presentations. Capabilities include focus groups and observations, client
and stakeholder interviews, on-line and written data collection, and
graphic illustrations complementing reports. GMU’s CAPH personnel
also conduct training on evaluation design and strategies
NCAA CHOICES Grantees
IMPACT Evaluation Resource
|
 |
This IMPACT Evaluation Resource is designed to assist campus professionals
with the design and implementation of the evaluation of their CHOICES Alcohol
Education efforts. Specific guidance and resource assistance is offered for preparing
meaningful and appropriate outcome and process evaluations. This resource helps
project leaders as they monitor their progress and document their success. Its aim is to
enhance evaluation efforts, as well as to prepare for sharing insights and lessons. The
ultimate impact desired through the use of this resource is to increase the breadth and
quality of campus-based programs and initiatives, with a focus on developing and
enhancing connections across campus with athletics. |
|
|
Community Evaluation Planning
Process:
TUNE UP |
|
This resource complements a training
activity and extensive resource for community leaders. The focus
is on assisting organization and project personnel, typically with
a small budget, with designing and implementing evaluation activities.
Emphasizing six areas - Tools, Understanding, Negotiating, Effort,
Us and Presentation – this resource assists with evaluation
design through the use of worksheets and background materials. |
| |
Qualitative Evaluation
(Qualitative Research: The What and Why) |
|
Emphasizing the important role of qualitative
evaluation, this booklet focuses on three methodological strategies:
focus groups, interviews and observations. For each of these approaches,
background information, suggestions, limitations, skills, and tips
are offered; in addition, worksheets assist with preparing individuals
to implement these strategies. |
| |
Step by Step Evaluation Guide |
|
This evaluation resource guide, organized
around 14-steps, assists leadership personnel with three phases
of evaluation: project
preparation, evaluation design, and evaluation implementation.
Emphasizing feedback loops to enhance a project’s impact
and value, this guide prepares organizers with the background and
rationale for each
of the steps, including worksheets for preparation and planning. |
| |
Training for Community Leaders
on Evaluation Strategies
A range of training opportunities are incorporated with these resource
booklets and documents, as well as on related issues. Training complements
the resources, as it helps enhance the competence and confidence of local
personnel as they strive to improve their programs and their impact.
Training on “Doing What You Want With Your
Data” and using SPSS-X |
|
This resource is prepared to help community and campus
leaders with managing their data. Typically using SPSS-X or other
statistical packages, program evaluation data can be analyzed and
reviewed using skillful approaches; this requires appropriate preparation
and design. Also emphasized are strategies that help in data management
activities.
|
Workshops
Evaluation and Accountibility |
|
Main Objectives:
• To provide project staff with some broader perspectives about evaluation
• To stress the role that accountability has with evaluation
• To identify specific ways for enhancing a projects’ accountability
through evaluation
• To enhance the desire for being reflective about the public trust placed
in us
• To provide greater science and grounding regarding whether our programs
are making a difference
View
Presentation (2.5MB PPT) |
Evaluation projects and services have been conducted for and/or with
grants from the following groups and organizations:
BACCHUS & GAMMA PEER EDUCATION NETWORK |

|
- COLLEGIATE TOBACCO PREVENTION INITIATIVE is
a multi-pronged approach to evaluate campus-based tobacco prevention
and policy implementation efforts has been conducted. This includes
revision of an existing student attitude and behavior survey, data
collection from students on multiple colleges in Colorado using
an on-line survey, e-mail notification of students, follow-up with
non-respondents, data analysis, report preparation, and interpretation
of longitudinal findings. The evaluation also includes the development,
compilation, and reporting of campus and community strategies using
an Environmental Scan instrument. Further, the evaluation incorporates
interviews with efforts and community leaders. The synthesis of
these various evaluation strategies results in an overall report
of efforts and monitoring of progress. See also http://www.tobaccofreeu.org
- IMPAIRED DRVIVING PREVENTION INITIATIVE project
entails working closely with campuses striving to reduce impaired
driving among their students. It includes the development of a
clear logic model, assistance with development, preparation, and
implementation of a student survey, review of findings, implementation
of an Environmental Scan addressing policies, programs, and services,
and overall implementation of grounded initiatives to reduce impaired
driving. See also http://www.friendsdrivesober.org/
|
BOAT PEOPLE SOS |

|
On Sunday, June 8, 2008
The
Boat People SOS
presents
The Four Seasons (pdf)
at 3:00PM at
George Mason University's
Center for the Arts, Concert Hall
Co-sponsored by
George Mason University's
Center for the Advancement of Public Health
- TEENS WAIT. This
includes overall evaluation of an abstinence education project
designed for Vietnamese adolescents. Evaluation activities include
overall evaluation, design, assistance with development and analysis
of the event, pre-test post-test results, and long-term implementation
of a use attitude survey regarding abstinence and related issues.
On-going staff consultation and training is integral to this
project. See also http://www.bpsos.org/
- PALMA. We assist
evaluation with this community-based project focusing on substance
abuse prevention through intermediary groups and organizations
serving the Vietnamese community. This includes the development
of an organizational planning process whereby community groups
are reviewed and monitored on a three-tier system that promotes
greater self-efficacy and skills to systematically address substance
abuse issues. The project also incorporates on-going training
and consultation with staff. See also http://www.bpsos.org/
- STEP. We assist in the evaluation of STEP (Survivors Torture Empowerment Program) . The STEP program is focused on older adults and family members as well as others in the Vietnamese community regarding health and mental issues. The program also includes in-depth training of peer companions in which CAPH personnel is involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating. http://www.bpsos.org/
|
FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS |

|
- COMMUNITIES THAT CARE SURVEYis a project involved
working with school and county personnel on the implementation
of
a youth
survey
in the school setting with 8th, 10th and 12th grade students.
This included instrument review, training of staff, implementing
the survey, program observations, preparation of data packets,
collection and secure storing of student surveys, and review
of findings. See also http://www.fcps.k12.va.us/DSSSE/SDFY/safe_drugfree.htm
|
INOVA KELLAR CENTER |

|
- OUTCOME STUDY. This includes review of adolescents
involved in two of the Center’s programmatic services:
day treatment and substance abuse services. The study included
training of the Center staff that conducted the interviews, as
well as interviews with prior youth participants. The data analysis
and recording incorporated review of results gathered from case
file reviews and the telephone interviews with prior participants
and/or their parents or guardians. See also http://www.inova.org/
|
MANASSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS |

|
- STUDENT SURVEY. On a biannual basis,
this student-based evaluation addressed alcohol, drugs and violence
issues among middle and high school students. We developed the
instrument in conjunction with school personnel, making revisions
each time the instrument was implemented by school personnel. We
coded, stored, analyzed, interpreted, and recorded on results gathered
from over 2,000 students each survey administration. This also
included talking with staff in the interpretation of findings,
which were then used for program and policy review. See also http://www.manassas.k12.va.us/
|
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY |

|
- PROJECT IMPACT. Evaluation incorporated the
development, implementation, analysis and reporting of two campus-based
student instruments. One instrument was for pre-test post-test
design implemented with freshmen seminar courses using comparisons
among four types of classroom settings with first-year students.
The other instrument was designed, implemented, analyzed and
reported for students campus-wide to assess the longer-term impact
of the project implementation. The campus has incorporated training
of staff and intermediaries on evaluation strategies. See also http://www.marshall.edu/
|
NORTHERN VIRGINIA AIDS MINISTRY |

|
- HIV/AIDS AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AMONG
YOUTH. Developed multiple strategies and protocols to
monitor outcomes and processes among youth involved in HIV/AIDS
and substance abuse prevention program. This includes development
of a logic-based, grounded instrument to assess impact regarding
knowledge, attitudes, behavior, and intentions among youth leaders
participating in training. All resources developed were culturally-
and age-appropriate. It also includes analysis, interpretation
and reporting of longitudinal data among youth participants.
Further, data collection and reporting among workshop attendees
is conducted. Normally, focus groups, staff interviews, and observations
of activities are conducted. See also http://www.novam.org/
|
NORTH-AMERICAN INTERFRATERNITY CONFERENCE |

|
- ALCOHOL SUMMITS. As evaluators of this project
designed to change the campus culture around alcohol through
proactive leadership by fraternity and sorority members, CAPH
personnel designed and implemented an outcome and process evaluation.
Initial funding for the project was provided by the U.S. Department
of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The design included stakeholder interviews, staff discussions,
observations, pre-test/post-test instrumentation, and compilation
of insights and recommendations for program implementation. See
also http://www.nicindy.org/
|
OHIO TOBACCO PREVENTION INITIATIVE |

|
- Using the student survey prepared for the BACCHUS & GAMMA
Peer Education Network, CAPH hosted on-line data collection for
Ohio colleges and universities. This includes notification of
students, follow-up with non-respondents, hosting an on-line
survey, data cleaning, and summary reporting. See also http://www.tobaccofreeu.org
|
The PRINCE WILLIAM HEALTH PARTNERSHIP AUTHORITY (PWPHA) |
 |
- PWPHA SKIP.
The Prince William Health Partnership Authority SKIP program focuses on youth regarding their perceptions and behaviors on a wide variety of topics. These include the use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs, as well as self-esteem and the relationships the youth have with their parents or caregivers. CAPH services as the evaluators for this project on the various topics the SKIP program addresses.
|
| |
|
THE CENTURY COUNCIL |
 |
- PROMISING PRACTICES: CAMPUS ALCOHOL STRATEGIES. Specific
evaluation with college campuses included telephone interviews
and follow-up assessments to determine ways in which campuses
have implemented strategies and used resources affiliated with
the Promising Practices project. See also http://centurycouncil.org/
|
U.S. CENTER FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION
(CSAP) |
|
- CULTURAL COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT. Through
use of written surveys, focus groups, staff interviews and
dialogue with leadership, an overall assessment of cultural
competence issues and issues was prepared for CSAP in conjunction
with a local firm. This resulted in training initiatives undertaken
with staff and the identification and provision of resource
material. See also http://prevention.samhsa.gov/
|
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION |
|
- EVALUATION. Training on evaluation and accountability
including keynote and workshop sessions on promoting outcome
based strategies and meaningful results. The emphasis has been
upon promoting greater value with projects, and enhanced attention
to accountability with projects and activities. See also http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osdfs/index.html
|
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
CONTROL |
 |
- UNDERAGE DRINKING PREVENTION EFFORT. Strategies
to address underage drinking have been evaluated with a community-based
focus for localities throughout the state. This includes an overall “menu” of
strategies and potential measures for these. Also developed have
been an online community opinionnaire, pre/post tests for law
enforcement, assessments of merchant activities and training,
and youth surveys were developed. These are compiled in a resource
for communities entitled “Evaluation of Community Underage
Drinking Efforts.” See also http://www.abc.state.va.us/
- COLLEGE CONSORTIUM. Campus leaders are engaged
in a set of consortium activities with an evaluation of their
programmatic effectiveness. Strategies included a campus leader
survey, leadership discussion groups, individual interviews,
and review of program effectiveness. See also http://www.abc.state.va.us/
- COMMUNITY EVALUATION EFFORTS. A range of community-based
tools and resources was prepared for communities addressing drug
and alcohol issues, particularly communities with limited evaluation
budgets. The evaluation efforts also included the preparation
of “TUNE UP” training and resources. See also http://www.abc.state.va.us/
|
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES |
 |
- COMMUNITY ASSESSMENTS. Needs assessments and
potential strategies to address traffic safety issues in regions
throughout the state were implemented. These included discussion
groups, telephone interviews and written assessments. See also http://www.dmvnow.com/
|
.
YOUTH FOR TOMORROW |
 |
- EVALUATION PROJECT. This outcome and process-based
evaluation is designed to assist project staff with a residential
treatment program for youth. It includes interviews with graduates
and attendees regarding their experience with the program including
a review of the academic, counseling and overall experience with
the program. It also includes interviews with parents or guardians
of prior participants, as well as staff interviews and discussions.
See also http://www.youthfortomorrow.org
|
|
Affiliated Sites
Healthy Expectations & Compass
Promising Practices
Traffic Safety
Legacy of Life
CEHD and RHT
College of Education and
Human Development
(CEHD)
School of Recreation, Health
and Tourism (RHT)
New to Our Site!
The IMPACT Evaluation Resource for NCAA CHOICES Grantees

The Loudoun Youth Study 2006

LEGACY OF LIFE:
Creating Healthy Futures

CD-ROM and
Powerpoint Show!
The 2006 College Alcohol Survey Results

|